Privacy-safe aggregate report

Alumni Feedback on Curriculum and Its Transaction – 2025-26 Results

Aggregate ratings for Academic Year 2025-26. Individual identities and written comments are excluded.

Alumni Feedback on Curriculum and Its Transaction – 2025-26 Results Print this report or save a PDF copy.
Rated respondents 51 Responses containing a valid score
Overall mean score 4.32 / 5.00 Across scored questions
Normalised mean score 86.4% Mean score expressed as a percentage of the maximum

Question-wise performance

Stakeholder indicators

Mean scores and complete aggregate rating distributions are shown for each indicator.

1

The curriculum was relevant to current industry and employment trends

4.57
Mean: 4.57 / 5.00 91.4%

Rating distribution

  • Excellent3058.8%
  • Very Good2039.2%
  • Good12.0%
  • Average00.0%
  • Poor00.0%
2

The curriculum was comprehensive and well structured

4.27
Mean: 4.27 / 5.00 85.5%

Rating distribution

  • Excellent1937.3%
  • Very Good2752.9%
  • Good59.8%
  • Average00.0%
  • Poor00.0%
3

The curriculum helped develop technical and professional skills

4.41
Mean: 4.41 / 5.00 88.2%

Rating distribution

  • Excellent2345.1%
  • Very Good2651.0%
  • Good23.9%
  • Average00.0%
  • Poor00.0%
4

The curriculum provided adequate exposure to real-world applications, including projects and case studies

4.20
Mean: 4.20 / 5.00 83.9%

Rating distribution

  • Excellent1325.5%
  • Very Good3568.6%
  • Good35.9%
  • Average00.0%
  • Poor00.0%
5

Teachers were well prepared and knowledgeable

4.27
Mean: 4.27 / 5.00 85.5%

Rating distribution

  • Excellent2039.2%
  • Very Good2549.0%
  • Good611.8%
  • Average00.0%
  • Poor00.0%
6

Teaching methods, including ICT tools, practicals and discussions, were effective

4.25
Mean: 4.25 / 5.00 85.1%

Rating distribution

  • Excellent1631.4%
  • Very Good3262.7%
  • Good35.9%
  • Average00.0%
  • Poor00.0%
7

Assessments and evaluations were fair and transparent

4.29
Mean: 4.29 / 5.00 85.9%

Rating distribution

  • Excellent2141.2%
  • Very Good2447.1%
  • Good611.8%
  • Average00.0%
  • Poor00.0%
8

Opportunities for interaction and feedback during the course were sufficient

4.31
Mean: 4.31 / 5.00 86.3%

Rating distribution

  • Excellent1937.3%
  • Very Good2956.9%
  • Good35.9%
  • Average00.0%
  • Poor00.0%
9

The curriculum provided experiential learning through field visits, internships and related activities

4.18
Mean: 4.18 / 5.00 83.5%

Rating distribution

  • Excellent1427.5%
  • Very Good3262.7%
  • Good59.8%
  • Average00.0%
  • Poor00.0%
10

Overall satisfaction with how the curriculum was delivered

4.43
Mean: 4.43 / 5.00 88.6%

Rating distribution

  • Excellent2447.1%
  • Very Good2549.0%
  • Good23.9%
  • Average00.0%
  • Poor00.0%
Privacy protection: names, email addresses, telephone numbers, respondent references and qualitative answers are excluded from this public report.

News

Tata Electronics Placement Drive at SPACES Degree College (A)-01.10.2026

Tata Electronics Placement Drive at SPACES Degree College (Autonomous) - 01.10.2026 SPACES Degree College (Autonomous), Payakaraopeta, organised a special placement drive for girl students in association with Tata Electronics. The initiative was aimed at providing students with meaningful employment opportunities and…

Read announcement