Reviewed historical analytics
NAAC Student Satisfaction Survey – 2025-26 Results
Question-wise institutional indicators for 2025-26. No individual response is displayed.
Question-wise performance
Teaching–learning indicators
How much of the syllabus was covered in the class?
3.74How well did the teachers prepare for the classes?
3.55How effectively were teachers able to communicate?
3.54How would you describe the teachers’ approach to teaching?
3.44How fair was the internal evaluation process?
3.49Was your performance in assignments discussed with you?
3.50How actively does the institution promote internships, student exchange and field visits?
3.41How well does teaching and mentoring support your cognitive, social and emotional growth?
3.37The institution provides multiple opportunities to learn and grow.
3.37How often do teachers explain expected competencies, course outcomes and programme outcomes?
3.46How consistently does your mentor follow up on assigned tasks?
3.48How often do teachers illustrate concepts through examples and applications?
3.49How well do teachers identify your strengths and provide suitable challenges?
3.39How well do teachers identify your weaknesses and help you overcome them?
3.49The institution engages students in monitoring and improving the teaching–learning process.
3.41To what extent are student-centric methods used, including experiential, participative and problem-solving learning?
3.42Teachers encourage participation in extracurricular activities.
3.38To what extent are soft skills, life skills and employability skills developed?
3.44What percentage of teachers use ICT tools while teaching?
3.44The overall quality of the teaching–learning process is very good.
3.49Participation profile
Combined demographic summary
Gender
- Female224
- Male96
Programme level
- Bachelor’s318
- Master’s2
Subject area
- Science200
- Bba/bca74
- Commerce37
- Arts5
