Reviewed historical analytics

NAAC Student Satisfaction Survey – 2025-26 Results

Question-wise institutional indicators for 2025-26. No individual response is displayed.

2025-26 Results Print this report or save a PDF copy.
Total respondents320Reviewed valid responses
Overall mean score3.46 / 4.00Across scored questions
Normalised mean score86.6%Mean score expressed as a percentage of the maximum

Question-wise performance

Teaching–learning indicators

Each indicator shows its mean score, normalised performance and the actual response distribution.

1

How much of the syllabus was covered in the class?

3.74
Mean: 3.74 / 4.00 93.4%

Response distribution

  • 85–100%24977.8%
  • 70–84%6319.7%
  • 55–69%41.3%
  • 30–54%30.9%
  • Below 30%10.3%
2

How well did the teachers prepare for the classes?

3.55
Mean: 3.55 / 4.00 88.7%

Response distribution

  • Thoroughly18056.3%
  • Satisfactorily13542.2%
  • Poorly51.6%
  • Indifferently00.0%
  • Did not prepare00.0%
3

How effectively were teachers able to communicate?

3.54
Mean: 3.54 / 4.00 88.4%

Response distribution

  • Always effective18658.1%
  • Sometimes effective12037.5%
  • Satisfactory144.4%
  • Generally ineffective00.0%
  • Very poor communication00.0%
4

How would you describe the teachers’ approach to teaching?

3.44
Mean: 3.44 / 4.00 86.0%

Response distribution

  • Excellent16451.3%
  • Very good13441.9%
  • Good216.6%
  • Fair10.3%
  • Poor00.0%
5

How fair was the internal evaluation process?

3.49
Mean: 3.49 / 4.00 87.3%

Response distribution

  • Always fair16852.5%
  • Usually fair14144.1%
  • Sometimes unfair113.4%
  • Usually unfair00.0%
  • Unfair00.0%
6

Was your performance in assignments discussed with you?

3.50
Mean: 3.50 / 4.00 87.5%

Response distribution

  • Every time17655.0%
  • Usually13241.3%
  • Occasionally82.5%
  • Rarely41.3%
  • Never00.0%
7

How actively does the institution promote internships, student exchange and field visits?

3.41
Mean: 3.41 / 4.00 85.2%

Response distribution

  • Regularly17855.6%
  • Often10332.2%
  • Sometimes3310.3%
  • Rarely41.3%
  • Never20.6%
8

How well does teaching and mentoring support your cognitive, social and emotional growth?

3.37
Mean: 3.37 / 4.00 84.1%

Response distribution

  • Significantly15046.9%
  • Very well14144.1%
  • Moderately257.8%
  • Marginally41.3%
  • Not at all00.0%
9

The institution provides multiple opportunities to learn and grow.

3.37
Mean: 3.37 / 4.00 84.2%

Response distribution

  • Strongly agree14846.3%
  • Agree14244.4%
  • Neutral309.4%
  • Disagree00.0%
  • Strongly disagree00.0%
10

How often do teachers explain expected competencies, course outcomes and programme outcomes?

3.46
Mean: 3.46 / 4.00 86.6%

Response distribution

  • Every time16651.9%
  • Usually13742.8%
  • Occasionally165.0%
  • Rarely10.3%
  • Never00.0%
11

How consistently does your mentor follow up on assigned tasks?

3.48
Mean: 3.48 / 4.00 87.1%

Response distribution

  • Every time17354.1%
  • Usually13241.3%
  • Occasionally134.1%
  • Rarely10.3%
  • I do not have a mentor10.3%
12

How often do teachers illustrate concepts through examples and applications?

3.49
Mean: 3.49 / 4.00 87.2%

Response distribution

  • Every time17354.1%
  • Usually13140.9%
  • Occasionally154.7%
  • Rarely10.3%
  • Never00.0%
13

How well do teachers identify your strengths and provide suitable challenges?

3.39
Mean: 3.39 / 4.00 84.8%

Response distribution

  • Fully15849.4%
  • Reasonably13241.3%
  • Partially288.8%
  • Slightly20.6%
  • Unable to00.0%
14

How well do teachers identify your weaknesses and help you overcome them?

3.49
Mean: 3.49 / 4.00 87.3%

Response distribution

  • Every time17755.3%
  • Usually12639.4%
  • Occasionally144.4%
  • Rarely30.9%
  • Never00.0%
15

The institution engages students in monitoring and improving the teaching–learning process.

3.41
Mean: 3.41 / 4.00 85.2%

Response distribution

  • Strongly agree16050.0%
  • Agree13040.6%
  • Neutral309.4%
  • Disagree00.0%
  • Strongly disagree00.0%
16

To what extent are student-centric methods used, including experiential, participative and problem-solving learning?

3.42
Mean: 3.42 / 4.00 85.5%

Response distribution

  • To a great extent15849.4%
  • Moderately14144.1%
  • Sometimes185.6%
  • Very little30.9%
  • Not at all00.0%
17

Teachers encourage participation in extracurricular activities.

3.38
Mean: 3.38 / 4.00 84.6%

Response distribution

  • Strongly agree16752.2%
  • Agree11034.4%
  • Neutral4213.1%
  • Disagree10.3%
  • Strongly disagree00.0%
18

To what extent are soft skills, life skills and employability skills developed?

3.44
Mean: 3.44 / 4.00 86.0%

Response distribution

  • To a great extent16752.2%
  • Moderately12840.0%
  • Sometimes247.5%
  • Very little10.3%
  • Not at all00.0%
19

What percentage of teachers use ICT tools while teaching?

3.44
Mean: 3.44 / 4.00 85.9%

Response distribution

  • Above 90%16350.9%
  • 70–89%13742.8%
  • 50–69%185.6%
  • 30–49%10.3%
  • Below 30%10.3%
20

The overall quality of the teaching–learning process is very good.

3.49
Mean: 3.49 / 4.00 87.3%

Response distribution

  • Strongly agree17454.4%
  • Agree13040.6%
  • Neutral165.0%
  • Disagree00.0%
  • Strongly disagree00.0%

Participation profile

Combined demographic summary

Aggregate participation only; no individual respondent information is shown.

Gender

  • Female22470.0%
  • Male9630.0%

Programme level

  • Bachelor’s320100.0%

Subject area

  • Science20063.3%
  • Bba/bca7423.4%
  • Commerce3711.7%
  • Arts51.6%
Privacy protection: names, roll numbers, IP addresses, respondent references and qualitative suggestions are excluded from this public report.

News

Tata Electronics Placement Drive at SPACES Degree College (A)-01.10.2026

Tata Electronics Placement Drive at SPACES Degree College (Autonomous) - 01.10.2026 SPACES Degree College (Autonomous), Payakaraopeta, organised a special placement drive for girl students in association with Tata Electronics. The initiative was aimed at providing students with meaningful employment opportunities and…

Read announcement