Reviewed historical analytics
NAAC Student Satisfaction Survey – 2025-26 Results
Question-wise institutional indicators for 2025-26. No individual response is displayed.
Question-wise performance
Teaching–learning indicators
Each indicator shows its mean score, normalised performance and the actual response distribution.
How much of the syllabus was covered in the class?
3.74Response distribution
- 85–100%24977.8%
- 70–84%6319.7%
- 55–69%41.3%
- 30–54%30.9%
- Below 30%10.3%
How well did the teachers prepare for the classes?
3.55Response distribution
- Thoroughly18056.3%
- Satisfactorily13542.2%
- Poorly51.6%
- Indifferently00.0%
- Did not prepare00.0%
How effectively were teachers able to communicate?
3.54Response distribution
- Always effective18658.1%
- Sometimes effective12037.5%
- Satisfactory144.4%
- Generally ineffective00.0%
- Very poor communication00.0%
How would you describe the teachers’ approach to teaching?
3.44Response distribution
- Excellent16451.3%
- Very good13441.9%
- Good216.6%
- Fair10.3%
- Poor00.0%
How fair was the internal evaluation process?
3.49Response distribution
- Always fair16852.5%
- Usually fair14144.1%
- Sometimes unfair113.4%
- Usually unfair00.0%
- Unfair00.0%
Was your performance in assignments discussed with you?
3.50Response distribution
- Every time17655.0%
- Usually13241.3%
- Occasionally82.5%
- Rarely41.3%
- Never00.0%
How actively does the institution promote internships, student exchange and field visits?
3.41Response distribution
- Regularly17855.6%
- Often10332.2%
- Sometimes3310.3%
- Rarely41.3%
- Never20.6%
How well does teaching and mentoring support your cognitive, social and emotional growth?
3.37Response distribution
- Significantly15046.9%
- Very well14144.1%
- Moderately257.8%
- Marginally41.3%
- Not at all00.0%
The institution provides multiple opportunities to learn and grow.
3.37Response distribution
- Strongly agree14846.3%
- Agree14244.4%
- Neutral309.4%
- Disagree00.0%
- Strongly disagree00.0%
How often do teachers explain expected competencies, course outcomes and programme outcomes?
3.46Response distribution
- Every time16651.9%
- Usually13742.8%
- Occasionally165.0%
- Rarely10.3%
- Never00.0%
How consistently does your mentor follow up on assigned tasks?
3.48Response distribution
- Every time17354.1%
- Usually13241.3%
- Occasionally134.1%
- Rarely10.3%
- I do not have a mentor10.3%
How often do teachers illustrate concepts through examples and applications?
3.49Response distribution
- Every time17354.1%
- Usually13140.9%
- Occasionally154.7%
- Rarely10.3%
- Never00.0%
How well do teachers identify your strengths and provide suitable challenges?
3.39Response distribution
- Fully15849.4%
- Reasonably13241.3%
- Partially288.8%
- Slightly20.6%
- Unable to00.0%
How well do teachers identify your weaknesses and help you overcome them?
3.49Response distribution
- Every time17755.3%
- Usually12639.4%
- Occasionally144.4%
- Rarely30.9%
- Never00.0%
The institution engages students in monitoring and improving the teaching–learning process.
3.41Response distribution
- Strongly agree16050.0%
- Agree13040.6%
- Neutral309.4%
- Disagree00.0%
- Strongly disagree00.0%
To what extent are student-centric methods used, including experiential, participative and problem-solving learning?
3.42Response distribution
- To a great extent15849.4%
- Moderately14144.1%
- Sometimes185.6%
- Very little30.9%
- Not at all00.0%
Teachers encourage participation in extracurricular activities.
3.38Response distribution
- Strongly agree16752.2%
- Agree11034.4%
- Neutral4213.1%
- Disagree10.3%
- Strongly disagree00.0%
To what extent are soft skills, life skills and employability skills developed?
3.44Response distribution
- To a great extent16752.2%
- Moderately12840.0%
- Sometimes247.5%
- Very little10.3%
- Not at all00.0%
What percentage of teachers use ICT tools while teaching?
3.44Response distribution
- Above 90%16350.9%
- 70–89%13742.8%
- 50–69%185.6%
- 30–49%10.3%
- Below 30%10.3%
The overall quality of the teaching–learning process is very good.
3.49Response distribution
- Strongly agree17454.4%
- Agree13040.6%
- Neutral165.0%
- Disagree00.0%
- Strongly disagree00.0%
Participation profile
Combined demographic summary
Aggregate participation only; no individual respondent information is shown.
Gender
- Female22470.0%
- Male9630.0%
Programme level
- Bachelor’s320100.0%
Subject area
- Science20063.3%
- Bba/bca7423.4%
- Commerce3711.7%
- Arts51.6%
