Privacy-safe aggregate report
Student Feedback on Curriculum and Its Transaction – 2024-25 Results
Aggregate ratings for Academic Year 2024-25. Individual identities and written comments are excluded.
Question-wise performance
Stakeholder indicators
Mean scores and complete aggregate rating distributions are shown for each indicator.
1
Relevance of the curriculum to the programme
4.11
Mean:
4.11 / 5.00
82.2%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent4131.8%
- Very Good6248.1%
- Good2519.4%
- Average10.8%
- Poor00.0%
2
Structure and organisation of the curriculum; integration of current trends and industry needs
3.76
Mean:
3.76 / 5.00
75.2%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2116.3%
- Very Good5845.0%
- Good4837.2%
- Average21.6%
- Poor00.0%
3
Promotion of skill development and employability
3.71
Mean:
3.71 / 5.00
74.1%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2116.3%
- Very Good5341.1%
- Good5139.5%
- Average43.1%
- Poor00.0%
4
Encouragement of analytical thinking and problem-solving
3.69
Mean:
3.69 / 5.00
73.8%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2317.8%
- Very Good5441.9%
- Good4131.8%
- Average118.5%
- Poor00.0%
5
Clarity and effectiveness of teaching
3.74
Mean:
3.74 / 5.00
74.7%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2519.4%
- Very Good5139.5%
- Good4736.4%
- Average64.7%
- Poor00.0%
6
Use of interactive teaching methods
3.67
Mean:
3.67 / 5.00
73.3%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2015.5%
- Very Good5643.4%
- Good4333.3%
- Average107.8%
- Poor00.0%
7
Use of ICT and modern teaching aids
3.68
Mean:
3.68 / 5.00
73.6%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2317.8%
- Very Good5139.5%
- Good4635.7%
- Average97.0%
- Poor00.0%
8
Student engagement and participation in the classroom
3.79
Mean:
3.79 / 5.00
75.8%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2922.5%
- Very Good5038.8%
- Good4434.1%
- Average64.7%
- Poor00.0%
9
Availability of relevant learning resources
3.67
Mean:
3.67 / 5.00
73.5%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2015.5%
- Very Good5240.3%
- Good5240.3%
- Average53.9%
- Poor00.0%
10
Fairness and transparency of internal evaluation
3.62
Mean:
3.62 / 5.00
72.4%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2418.6%
- Very Good4131.8%
- Good5542.6%
- Average97.0%
- Poor00.0%
11
Relevance of assignments and projects
3.75
Mean:
3.75 / 5.00
75.0%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2317.8%
- Very Good5744.2%
- Good4333.3%
- Average64.7%
- Poor00.0%
12
Timely feedback and academic support from faculty
3.74
Mean:
3.74 / 5.00
74.9%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2620.2%
- Very Good5038.8%
- Good4736.4%
- Average64.7%
- Poor00.0%
13
Availability of remedial or mentoring support
3.66
Mean:
3.66 / 5.00
73.2%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2116.3%
- Very Good4837.2%
- Good5542.6%
- Average53.9%
- Poor00.0%
14
Overall satisfaction with the curriculum and its delivery
3.74
Mean:
3.74 / 5.00
74.9%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent2418.6%
- Very Good5139.5%
- Good5139.5%
- Average32.3%
- Poor00.0%
15
Practical applicability of the curriculum in real-life situations
3.52
Mean:
3.52 / 5.00
70.4%
Rating distribution
129responses
- Excellent1914.7%
- Very Good4534.9%
- Good5139.5%
- Average129.3%
- Poor21.6%
Privacy protection:
names, email addresses, telephone numbers,
respondent references and qualitative
answers are excluded from this public
report.