Privacy-safe aggregate report
Teacher Feedback on Curriculum and Its Transaction – 2024-25 Results
Aggregate ratings for Academic Year 2024-25. Individual identities and written comments are excluded.
Question-wise performance
Stakeholder indicators
Mean scores and complete aggregate rating distributions are shown for each indicator.
1
Relevance of the curriculum to current academic and industry standards
3.53
Mean:
3.53 / 5.00
70.5%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent00.0%
- Very Good1052.6%
- Good947.4%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
2
Appropriateness of the curriculum structure and content
3.63
Mean:
3.63 / 5.00
72.6%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent15.3%
- Very Good1052.6%
- Good842.1%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
3
Scope for incorporating innovative teaching methods
3.42
Mean:
3.42 / 5.00
68.4%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent210.5%
- Very Good631.6%
- Good1052.6%
- Average00.0%
- Poor15.3%
4
Curriculum emphasis on skill development and employability
3.63
Mean:
3.63 / 5.00
72.6%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent315.8%
- Very Good631.6%
- Good1052.6%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
5
Balance between theory and practical components
4.00
Mean:
4.00 / 5.00
80.0%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent315.8%
- Very Good1473.7%
- Good15.3%
- Average15.3%
- Poor00.0%
6
Availability of adequate learning resources for curriculum delivery
3.58
Mean:
3.58 / 5.00
71.6%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent15.3%
- Very Good947.4%
- Good947.4%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
7
Integration of ICT tools in curriculum implementation
3.95
Mean:
3.95 / 5.00
78.9%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent315.8%
- Very Good1368.4%
- Good210.5%
- Average15.3%
- Poor00.0%
8
Support for interdisciplinary and experiential learning
3.68
Mean:
3.68 / 5.00
73.7%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent15.3%
- Very Good1157.9%
- Good736.8%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
9
Curriculum responsiveness to local and national development needs
3.47
Mean:
3.47 / 5.00
69.5%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent15.3%
- Very Good947.4%
- Good736.8%
- Average210.5%
- Poor00.0%
10
Involvement of teachers in curriculum design and revision
3.58
Mean:
3.58 / 5.00
71.6%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent421.1%
- Very Good842.1%
- Good421.1%
- Average15.3%
- Poor210.5%
11
Effectiveness of internal assessment and evaluation methods
3.58
Mean:
3.58 / 5.00
71.6%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent315.8%
- Very Good526.3%
- Good1157.9%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
12
Alignment of the curriculum with research and project opportunities
3.26
Mean:
3.26 / 5.00
65.3%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent15.3%
- Very Good421.1%
- Good1368.4%
- Average15.3%
- Poor00.0%
13
Clarity of learning outcomes and objectives in the syllabus
3.63
Mean:
3.63 / 5.00
72.6%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent15.3%
- Very Good1157.9%
- Good631.6%
- Average15.3%
- Poor00.0%
14
Overall satisfaction with the curriculum and its transaction process
3.63
Mean:
3.63 / 5.00
72.6%
Rating distribution
19responses
- Excellent210.5%
- Very Good842.1%
- Good947.4%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
Privacy protection:
names, email addresses, telephone numbers,
respondent references and qualitative
answers are excluded from this public
report.