Privacy-safe aggregate report
Teacher Feedback on Curriculum and Its Transaction – 2025-26 Results
Aggregate ratings for Academic Year 2025-26. Individual identities and written comments are excluded.
Question-wise performance
Stakeholder indicators
Mean scores and complete aggregate rating distributions are shown for each indicator.
1
Relevance of the curriculum to current academic and industry standards
4.40
Mean:
4.40 / 5.00
88.0%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent1851.4%
- Very Good1337.1%
- Good411.4%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
2
Appropriateness of the curriculum structure and content
4.31
Mean:
4.31 / 5.00
86.3%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent1542.9%
- Very Good1645.7%
- Good411.4%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
3
Scope for incorporating innovative teaching methods
4.26
Mean:
4.26 / 5.00
85.1%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent1131.4%
- Very Good2262.9%
- Good25.7%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
4
Curriculum emphasis on skill development and employability
4.43
Mean:
4.43 / 5.00
88.6%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent1851.4%
- Very Good1440.0%
- Good38.6%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
5
Balance between theory and practical components
4.46
Mean:
4.46 / 5.00
89.1%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent1954.3%
- Very Good1337.1%
- Good38.6%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
6
Availability of adequate learning resources for curriculum delivery
4.40
Mean:
4.40 / 5.00
88.0%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent1954.3%
- Very Good1131.4%
- Good514.3%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
7
Integration of ICT tools in curriculum implementation
4.49
Mean:
4.49 / 5.00
89.7%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent2057.1%
- Very Good1234.3%
- Good38.6%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
8
Support for interdisciplinary and experiential learning
4.43
Mean:
4.43 / 5.00
88.6%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent1851.4%
- Very Good1440.0%
- Good38.6%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
9
Curriculum responsiveness to local and national development needs
4.31
Mean:
4.31 / 5.00
86.3%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent1542.9%
- Very Good1645.7%
- Good411.4%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
10
Involvement of teachers in curriculum design and revision
4.57
Mean:
4.57 / 5.00
91.4%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent2262.9%
- Very Good1131.4%
- Good25.7%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
11
Effectiveness of internal assessment and evaluation methods
4.51
Mean:
4.51 / 5.00
90.3%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent2160.0%
- Very Good1131.4%
- Good38.6%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
12
Alignment of the curriculum with research and project opportunities
4.31
Mean:
4.31 / 5.00
86.3%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent1748.6%
- Very Good1234.3%
- Good617.1%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
13
Clarity of learning outcomes and objectives in the syllabus
4.57
Mean:
4.57 / 5.00
91.4%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent2365.7%
- Very Good925.7%
- Good38.6%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
14
Overall satisfaction with the curriculum and its transaction process
4.40
Mean:
4.40 / 5.00
88.0%
Rating distribution
35responses
- Excellent1748.6%
- Very Good1542.9%
- Good38.6%
- Average00.0%
- Poor00.0%
Privacy protection:
names, email addresses, telephone numbers,
respondent references and qualitative
answers are excluded from this public
report.